The "liberal media?" Has there been anyone more accurately critical of Obama than the left? Huffington Post, Greenwald, Fire Dog Lake never shy away from criticizing the President. I just wish the circular firing squad would cool it a bit until November 3.

[deleted] · 1 year

The media sources you list are generally liberal. Obama is not. That is why he is criticized by the left.

[deleted] · 1 year

Greenwald is the best but why should the circular firing squad 'cool it'?

Godwhacker · 1 year

Relax. We can criticize the president and still stand up against the racist tea party douchebags.

blum1130 · 1 year

That's not the point. The "liberal media," is actually doing this thing called journalism. Leave the blatant hypocrisy to Fox and Drudge Report.

EDIT: For Punctuation

digital_bath · 1 year

Yes, they are. They focus on what he could be doing better, while the right focus on how he is a fascist Kenyan.

StopCencorship · 1 year

If the Democrats want to win, they should start behaving like winners.

Telling us to buck up and shut up is not good enough.

They'll get praise when they deserve praise. And they'll get lashed when they deserve it too, like right now.

wolfgangcm · 1 year

I just wish the circular firing squad would cool it a bit until November 3

I'm curious, wang-banger, if the left has been "accurately critical" of the Obama administration and the Democratic party in general, why do you want them to "cool it" at a time when voting Americans need accurate information about the parties they vote for?

What do you think? Is it more valuable to the electorate to have well-sourced, accurate, but potentially ugly reports about a party (in this case, the Democrats), or cherry-picked talking points argued by pundits whose sole goal is to sway voters to the party line? Are you suggesting that journalists on the left should avoid publishing material that may harm the election chances of Democratic candidates?

If you could clarify why you'd like journalists like Greenwald to "cool it", wang-banger, it would do a lot to elucidate the point of this post.

EDIT: Grammar

StopCencorship · 1 year

Stop telling me to censor myself.

spacedout · 1 year

Obama's not liberal.

khrak · 1 year

And Fox regularly criticized Bush. What's your point? The liberal media made jokes about his intelligence and attacked him on non-issues regularly.

Remember when Bush walked to the wrong door after a speech? They made fun of him for weeks for that. Obama got on stage and read SOMEONE ELSE'S SPEECH thanking himself. It didn't even make the news for the most part. Obama trying to enter the White House though a window? Unmentioned. If Bush had done it? Ya...

Obama doesn't get regularly attacked because the media is unbiased. He gets regularly attacked because he's not far enough left for most of them.

nofrak · 1 year

HuffPo, Greenwald, and FDL are not what people are referring to when they say "The Liberal Media."

victwells · 1 year

This post is outrageous!!!!Pathetic lies!!!!!! Story after story is covered up by the left, the huffington post is the demwit party!!! Even who obama is is covered up by the left. The attacks on conservative candidates, DO YOU REALLY THINK ANYONE BELIEVES THIS DRIBBLE YOU ARE SPEWING!! ???? The public isn't !!!That is why CNN is always in last place in the ''news'' Show me someone that thinks the huffington post is credible and I'll show you a leftist. Take the rag in Washington, the washington post. That rag,since 1932, has always endorsed the demwit candidate,almost a 100 years!!!! Not only that the demwit candidate has always won the debates,according to that rag!!! So with 100%accuracy we can predict who they will endorse and even who will win the debate, before we even know who it will be. A pathetic record and even more pathetic that someone would come on here and post more ,leftist,media lies!!!!

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login